PsyFi Search

Thursday, 25 February 2016

Behavioral Bias 101: #1 Illusory Pattern Recognition

The Man In The Moon

Pareidolia’s that odd moment where you perceive a familiar pattern where none actually exists: it’s the man-in-the-moon, the elephant in the clouds, a religious figure in a pastry. Pareidolia is a specific form of pattern recognition; the human brain is hard-wired to see faces in things, presumably to ensure that babies attend more to other people rather than random bits of plastic.  More generally, though, pattern recognition is critical to human functioning, but has a nasty tendency to go wrong.

Monday, 22 February 2016

7 Investing Lessons from Behavioral Psychology

Click … bait

You could start by not wasting your time clicking on stupid clickbait articles, I suppose. But since you’re here you might as well learn something.

Investing should be mainly about hard work, slogging through accounts and trying to figure out where or why a company has a defendable competitive advantage. But that’s not much help if you have the self control of an octogenarian with prostate trouble.  Investing is 90% hard work and 10% mental discipline – but don’t even bother if you haven’t got the 10%.

Friday, 19 February 2016

Scamming Journalists with Counterfactuals

Skim and Pump

Every so often there’s a story in the press about contactless payment cards being skimmed and money being extracted from them. Basically someone goes around tapping hapless commuters on the ass with a contactless card reader. Which given the state of the UK’s stupid prosecution service probably puts them more at risk of a charge of sexual assault than being arrested for theft.

This story is a recurring meme, and exemplifies what’s wrong with the state of financial journalism today. And on the way we get to look at real-world conspiracy theories and a bit of behavioral economics. What fun.

Wednesday, 17 February 2016

Robobias

Advisors' Suck

There’s a new class of financial intermediary in town: the robo-advisor. As I understand it, the human advisor’s financial knowledge is sucked out of their brains and up-loaded into a machine.  So, that shouldn’t take very long then.

But humans being the clever creatures that we are simply replacing the human advisor with a machine won’t save us from our own stupidity. We’re far too clever for that.

Monday, 15 February 2016

Investors, Still Chasing Hubcaps

Lowing and Highing

As we saw in The Proper Etiquette for Market Panics – which I wrote the last time we had some major market falls – what usually happens in a crisis is that markets fall and then exhibit volatility, as investors roam backwards and forwards in increasingly large herds while asking everyone else why it's happened and what they should do about it. Often the noise they make sounds suspiciously like cattle lowing.

Well, this happens (the volatility, not the lowing) because going down – and up – is what markets do, and if you don't understand that you shouldn't be allowed to play Monopoly, let alone invest in stocks. And asking what you should do about this after the event betrays a depressing level of incompetence and a woeful grasp of history. On the other hand a bit of cognitive dissonance can be just the trigger to for a teachable moment; the point at which a handful of people actually learn to be proper investors.

Thursday, 11 February 2016

Rethinking Economics: Let’s Get This Schism Started

Doctors of Doctrine

In the wake of the great crash of 2008 a lot of young people suddenly became interested in finance and signed up for university courses to learn about the detail of what went wrong. Instead, what they got was a load of nonsense dressed up as learning that bore little relation to the real world. Well, what did they expect, they chose to study economics?

Our of this was born the Rethinking Economics movement, an attempt to introduce new ideas and concepts into economic education, to adopt a pluralist approach. The problem with this, well meaning though it is, is that reforming economics is akin to Martin Luther nailing his theses to the door of All Saints' Church in Wittenberg: all it does is create a schism in a religious cult. Economics doesn't need re-thinking, it needs to be put out of its misery.

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

Pssst … Wanna Invest in a Conspiracy?

The Great Con

There is a great, massive, hideous conspiracy at the heart of modern financial system, designed to steal the ordinary person's money.  Like all of the best conspiracies, it's hidden in plain sight.

And the conspiracy is this: there is no system, no one knows what's going on and no one knows what's going to happen next. Fortunately we can now prove this, although perhaps not quite in the way intended.

Wednesday, 3 February 2016

HARKing Back: Lessons in Investing from Science

Confirm Ye Not

Here's what ought to be a really boring idea – we need scientists in general and psychologists and economists in particular to stop hypothesising after results are known (HARKing, geddit?). Instead they need to state what they're looking for before they conduct their experiments because otherwise they cherrypick the results they find to confirm hypotheses they never previously had.

The underlying problem is our old foe, confirmation bias. And the solution for scientists and social scientists alike is known as pre-registration. It would be no bad thing for investors to demand a similar process for fund managers and financial experts. Or, for that matter, to apply some of the ideas to their own investing strategies.

Monday, 1 February 2016

When Comfort Blankets Go Bad: Risk, Perception and Investing Theater

Investing as Performance Art

The security analyst Bruce Schneier describes many of the security measures on public display as  “security theater”: a meaningless set of rituals designed to provide a comfort blanket. He argues that these measures provide no useful protection and mainly serve to make our lives more difficult, increasing the risks we have to take while simultaneously restricting our freedoms.

I’d argue that much of the performance art we see around investing serves much the same purpose – and with much the same outcome. Box ticking regulations don't actually do much for investors other than make their lives more confusing and difficult; but with a lot of thought, and a bit of investing theater, we might be able to better align real risk and perception to everyone's benefit.